On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:54, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > Luckily I have a test rig and no-one but the spammer has got hurt up to > now (apart from postings to this list, used as examples). As for the > Bayesian stuff is concerned, its trigger for learning remains on 12.
Actually, I'm curious about that one. When I'm on this list (or any mail abuse list), I'm obviously going to have to all_spam_to the list to see the messages. However, does that prevent the Bayesian tests from auto-learning from the mail? Or, am I training my filters to accept spam by accepting this list? For reference, I set auto_learn to 1 for testing purposes. -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This message granted to the Public Domain in 2023. Fight the DMCA and copyright extension! http://eldred.cc/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk