Being the "joker" that was the cause of this thread I can only support
the response of others that such a reaction to a posting in *this* list
amazes me a bit. Just wanted to share as much info as necessary and that
obviously will sometimes create false negatives.... My mail was not
meant to offending, but.... If so please give me and others guidelines
on how to circumvent your interpretations of what if offending and what
not ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On 
> Behalf Of Tony Earnshaw
> Sent: vrijdag 31 januari 2003 12:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Received: from bowser (bowser.slooff.net 
> [192.168.0.3])
> 
> 
> This joker/subscriber set off my automatic smtp 550 mail 
> refusal system
> under SA 2.50-CVS, so that particular posting from this list got
> refused. His SA 2.43 accepted it.
> 
> I hope the list software doesn't kick me off for one 550. 
> I've put it in
> the whitelist, now - so it shouldn't happen any more.
> 
> I've gzipped his offending mail and attached it, so that 
> people can see
> *why* it was refused (it got 9.1 points, trigger is 5.0). If the list
> strips attachments, so be it.
> 
> B.t.w., even though this was refused with a 550, SA-Exim puts it in a
> cesspit, so that it can be examined at leisure. cron mails a list of
> refused stuff to root each day, with the relevant details.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to