On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 12:18:09PM -0700, Paul Fries wrote: > I believe there was talk of fixing this option. Perhaps by running all > of the negative scoring tests first.
Well, the issue is that SA was doing alternating negative/positive for
different types of rules (body, head, rawbody, etc.)
We found that the performance hit for the people not using -S (most
everyone) should be made up for the people that do use it by some changes
that will be going in, some rules we're removing, etc.
You can look at the archives of sa-devel. There's also a bug to track
the removal.
3.0 should have some form of short-circuiting code in it.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I'd put my money where my mouth is, but my mouth keeps moving.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg11571/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
