On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Mike Loiterman wrote: > > > I normally use spamd, and its performance seems fine, but I recently > had a reasons to fire-up spamassassin. It seems unusually slow to do >just about anything..even to do a "spamassassin -V". Definition of slow: >about 20 seconds to just to a ' -V'. Just wondering if anyone had any >input about this...using 2.43. My machine has 64 megs of RAM and I have >a LOT of things running in the background: mysql, apache, sendmail, >stunnel, etc., so I suppose I've answered my own question. Nevertheless, >I remember using earlier versions of SA and doing spamassassin -t type >stuff without any noticeable delays. That was back around 2.3x if I >remember correctly. Thanks >
Every time you load spamassassin you have to load the entire perl interpreter and it's environment. It has to scan it's library pathis (I believe...) and you may have more in place now. That takes time. Plus you're running a lot of other processess as well. I would suspect this to be the issue at hand. -Mike Saunders method at method dot cx ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
