-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I normally use spamd, and its performance seems fine, but I recently had a reasons to fire-up spamassassin. It seems unusually slow to do just about anything..even to do a "spamassassin -V". Definition of slow: about 20 seconds to just to a ' -V'. Just wondering if anyone had any input about this...using 2.43. My machine has 64 megs of RAM and I have a LOT of things running in the background: mysql, apache, sendmail, stunnel, etc., so I suppose I've answered my own question. Nevertheless, I remember using earlier versions of SA and doing spamassassin -t type stuff without any noticeable delays. That was back around 2.3x if I remember correctly. Thanks
- ------------------------------------------- Randomly Generated Quote: In the struggle between you and the world, back the world. --Franz Kafka Mike Loiterman PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E http://www.ascendency.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 Comment: This message has been digitally signed by Mike Loiterman iQA/AwUBPg+MsGjZbUnRudGOEQLHAwCgsdyOWF1yjxvh6sLzYSqgAbDAIYkAn12M HPtfo2Qc6uaWpDRiwnTJIAtM =T8nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
