On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:12:48PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:45:39AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > > > Where can I get more informaiton on that? I *really* need "-m" to > > work. It semed to have been reliably on Linux w/Perl 5.6.1. > > > > If "-m" is hopelessly broken, does anyone have alternatives? > > > > Note, I'm on sa-talk but not sa-devel. Is that a better place to > > discuss this? > > Try it. If you have problems with it, disable it. Also, read up at > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
In particular, i've had success with removing the cleanupchildren call from REAPER. It seems that "If you're on IRIX or some other system that forces waits in a SIGCHLD handler, enable a switch if you want -m" is more sensible than "-m is borken, anyone who needs it is SOL"... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
