On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 13:17, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 01:52:31PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > The Nigerian scam rules need a serious revisiting. These spams are mutating > > to avoid the high-scoring rules, and the "general" rules like > > NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION1 hit a modest amount of nonspam so they don't wind up > > scoring high enough. They are also mutating heavily enough to avoid razor > > in many cases, which was another large contributor to SA's ability to catch > > Nigerian scams. > > I believe the goal is to let the bayesian stuff catch these whenever > the code gets added to SA. > > Overall, I don't get very many of these -- do other people see more? > I get maybe 1 or 2 a month if that (out of ~1700 spams/month). I'm seeing 3-6 a day, including to mailing lists I'm on.
LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
