On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 01:52:31PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > The Nigerian scam rules need a serious revisiting. These spams are mutating > to avoid the high-scoring rules, and the "general" rules like > NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION1 hit a modest amount of nonspam so they don't wind up > scoring high enough. They are also mutating heavily enough to avoid razor > in many cases, which was another large contributor to SA's ability to catch > Nigerian scams.
I believe the goal is to let the bayesian stuff catch these whenever the code gets added to SA. Overall, I don't get very many of these -- do other people see more? I get maybe 1 or 2 a month if that (out of ~1700 spams/month). -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I don't know what's wrong with my television set. I was getting C-Span and the Home Shopping Network on the same station. I actually bought a congressman." - Bruce Baum
msg09317/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
