> I'm curious about something -- can you actually create a recipe in > procmail to filter emails with X-Spam-Status at 20 or more to send emails > directly to /dev/null?
Yes, it looks like a couple of people have posted them. (note: I don't do this myself.) > And what exactly is the difference between 'probably-spam' and > 'definitely-spam' thresholds? That was my informal terminology. Current thresholds: 7+: "probably spam" - goes to a separate account and I browse through the headers in Outlook daily to catch the occasional false positive. I then move the valid spam to my spam corpus. 20+: "definitely spam" - dumps into a mailbox file on the server where I scan through it every couple of weeks just in case, then add it to my spam corpus. (In about 4 months using this system, I haven't yet had a 20+ false positive. I do lots of whitelisting, though.) -- Michael Moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "Let's have some new cliches." --Samuel Goldwyn ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
