Full message was 400K in size, don't know about you but I'm sure not
everybody on this list has a broadband connection, so I figure it is
better to be kind then blindly spam the list.
So I used spamassassin -tD < email-message
Now I get a score=5.7 required=5
Weird why would it go to 0/0 up with spamd/c combo?
Here is the full spamassassin report:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.7 required=5.0
tests=BIG_FONT,EXCUSE_15,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED,
HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MAILTO_LINK,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,MAY_BE_FORGED,NO_REAL_NAME,
SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,SUPERLONG_LINE,THIS_AINT_SPAM,
USER_AGENT_OE
version=2.42
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.42 (1.115.2.14-2002-10-04-exp)
X-Spam-Report: 5.70 hits, 5 required;
* 1.3 -- From: does not include a real name
* 0.4 -- Message with extraneous Content-type:...type= header
* 0.2 -- X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outlook Express)
* 0.0 -- 'Received:' has 'may be forged' warning
* 0.6 -- BODY: Claims to be legitimate email
* 0.4 -- BODY: Claims "This is not spam"
* 1.1 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 03 to 05 (medium)
[score: 3]
* 0.3 -- BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up
* 0.3 -- BODY: HTML mail with non-white background
* 0.3 -- BODY: HTML font color is red
* 0.2 -- BODY: Includes a URL link to send an email
* 0.0 -- BODY: Contains a line >=199 characters long
* 0.7 -- URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email address
* -0.1 -- Email came from some known mailing list software
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-talk-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of matt
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: John McCoy, Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SPAM message tricked SA???
Is it just me, or did you forget to include the message that tricked SA?
I seem to have gotten a set of full headers, but no message.
My suggestion, put the email back together again and run it through
command-line spamassassin -tD and see what it says. Often errors in
configuration aren't mentioned until you run spamassassin this way, or
with
--lint. -tD also provides a lot of other clues about the decisions SA is
making.
At 08:49 AM 10/11/2002 -0700, John McCoy, Jr. wrote:
>Not sure how but this message ended up with a required score of zero!
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=0
>I was mistakenly still running 2.50-CVS (2.42 proper now, just fixed)
>All messages received right before and after have the required=5
>I forwarded to my test system that is running 2.42 and got the same
>results, very weird.
>
>
>Full header follows the rest of the email available if you need it.
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
