On Wednesday 24 July 2002 06:49 pm, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 the voices made Matthew Cline write:
> > On Wednesday 24 July 2002 09:02 am, Hess, Mtodd, /mth wrote: > > > I hate to bring this up, but I see more and more spams that contain > > > very little, if any, text. Instead, most of the spam text is in a > > > graphic image. How will we be able to detect those as spam? OCR? > > There have been suggestions for a rule that would look at the ratio of > > text to HTML markup, and would give extra points if the ration was too > > low. That would catch messages like this. > The GA can only handle rules that give a simple hit or miss-result, right? There would be multiple rules, like "ratio < 0.9", "ratio < 0.5", "ratio < 0.3", and so on. -- Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. ICQ: 132152059 | Advanced SPAM filtering software: http://spamassasin.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
