On Saturday 06 July 2002 19:27 CET Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 the voices made CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson write: > > But with the large amount of Outlook Express users out there I imagine > > that this rule will cause alot of false positives. You can talk all > > day about MS not following RFC standards but in the end the customer > > still gets legitimate email tagged as Spam and is not happy and they > > don't care about RFCs. > > And... SA is there to protect against spam, not block e-mails from valid > sources because of some "I'm so much better than thou because I only read > RFC-valid e-mails"-thinking... which I'm sure no one here is guilty of, > right? =)
Have a look at the rule; it doesn't even check for an malformed To-header: | To =~ /Undisclosed.*Recipient(s[^:]|[^s])/i This will catch things like | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seems like this rule is a good candidate to be either rewritten or dumped. Malte -- -- Coding is art. -- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Got root? We do. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
