Looks great Daniel -- go ahead and check it in. Probably skip the iterations stuff for now.
C Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> Based on these results, my inclination is to add all of the above rules DQ> and let the GA sort it out. They all look pretty good to me except for DQ> DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 (it could just be my small sample size, though, DQ> because 7 out of the 9 false positives were from one guy). If any rules DQ> at the lower end of the range have a negative score, we can remove them DQ> later. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk