>>>>> "ON" == Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ON> Now, a score has to be assigned for each rule, so the GA and as ON> importantly a corpus of spam/non-spam is used. But going into too many ON> details may also be confusing as most of the users will not need to ON> deal with the GA. Given the way this arms race evolves (we improve, they "improve"), does the corpus change over time with these tricks? That is, is the corpus just growning, or are older messages deleted so that the scoring matches more accurately what is happening now, rather than trying to average out all the tricks ever used by spammers (including those they don't use anymore)? _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
