Klaus Heinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a message I received was tagged with DATE_IN_FUTURE but the 'Date:' > header was actually about a week in the past. > > The description of the rule is not as misleading as its name: > > 'Date: Differs by more than 4 days from current date' > > Should the name be changed to something like 'BIG_DATE_DIFFERENCE' or > should the rule check for future dates only?
Instead, I would change the rule to really be DATE_IN_FUTURE, leaving the description alone, and add a DATE_IN_PAST rule which would allow the GA assign a different score. My guess is that messages from the recent past will be less likely to be spam since they may just be delayed messages. Maybe increase the threshold for DATE_IN_PAST. Dan _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
