Hi,
a message I received was tagged with DATE_IN_FUTURE but the 'Date:' header
was actually about a week in the past.
The description of the rule is not as misleading as its name:
'Date: Differs by more than 4 days from current date'
Should the name be changed to something like 'BIG_DATE_DIFFERENCE' or
should the rule check for future dates only?
On this occasion I also noticed that the rule did not catch all dates
because of the test for the day name. According to RFC2822 (and RFC822)
this field and the following comma is optional and is indeed omitted by
qmail.
There is also a variable '$now' which is not used at all.
I will file a report with bugzilla.
ciao
Klaus
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
