Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, SA does that by (default) adding a -100 points to the message score. > So this spam, listed as from "concord.net" in the header gets -100, > then the actual spam scores brought it up to -67.
Yuck. How about moderating the whitelist modification by the pre-whitelist score? For example, divide the AWL by (score/5). So, since this message had an AWL of -100 and a pre-AWL score of 33. awl = -100/(33/5) awl = -15 final = 33 - 15 final = 18 The right way would probably be to search for AWL failures (really spammy mail gets through because of AWL) and determine a formula to eliminate those without any additional false positives. Dan _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
