Michael -- ...and then Michael Stenner said... % % On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:12:17PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > ... % > by tracking them down a la spamcop? When do I need to report something % > and when not? % % Razor wants all spam that is VERIFIED BY A HUMAN to be spam.* So yes,
So even if SA says that it racks up an 11.7 I should send it in, either 'cuz I got it at all or 'cuz the SA razor test (is there one?) didn't catch it. Hokay. So now how far back should I go? I have *lots* of old, confirmed spam (see my other thread; I have lots of confirmed not-spam, too). Is anything over, say, an hour old useful? Thanks again & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg05002/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
