> On Tuesday, May 14, 2002, at 08:24 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:28, Ron Carter wrote: > > > > :0: > > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > > /dev/null > > } > > > > I agree with Theo that piping to /dev/null is not a good idea because > > spamassassin is > > not perfect. > > I have > > :0: > * X-Spam-Level: ********** > /dev/null > > Although I would prefer a way to bounce it (with spamassasin headers), on > the off chance that there is ever legitimate mail with a spam score over 10. > The only once I've ever seen was a sample sent to this list with a score > of 39. Everything else over 8 has been spam.
We have seen a legit email (WellsFargo) that was scored at 9.8 because of it was "ALL-HTML" and had JavaScript in it. That said, yeah, switiching to the * X-Spam-Level: ************** (14 stars) might be a better approach instead of X-Spam-Status? Thanks! Ron _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
