Comments says: give negative score, but mail from Majordomo is scored with ~
1.3

grep -i majordomo *
20_body_tests.cf:# strange pattern because otherwise it matches the std.
majordomo line
20_head_tests.cf:# give a negative score to Majordomo results.
20_head_tests.cf:header   MAJORDOMO              Subject =~ /Majordomo
(?:request )?results/
20_head_tests.cf:describe MAJORDOMO              From Majordomo
50_scores.cf:score MAJORDOMO                      1.296

Re-subscribing to NANOG caused

SPAM: Content analysis details:   (3.7 hits, 3.4 required)
SPAM: Hit! (1.3 points)  From Majordomo
SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points)  From: does not include a real name
SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points)  No MX records for the From: domain

Indeed there is no MX RR for trapdoor.merit.edu ... and of course Majordomo
seldom has a real name.


Strange, Arnold


--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:/mobile: +49 172 2650958
fax: +49 1212 512 364 310


----- Original Message -----
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:45 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: What about this one?


> > This one did the same thing. The from address on this one is
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> For me:
>
> SPAM: Content analysis details:   (5.6 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: Hit! (-0.1 points) Subject: ends in a question mark
> SPAM: Hit! (1.4 points)  BODY: Trying to offer you something
> SPAM: Hit! (1.5 points)  BODY: Asks you to click below
> SPAM: Hit! (2.1 points)  BODY: Talks about opting in
> SPAM: Hit! (0.7 points)  BODY: Talks about email marketing
>
> According to your headers:
>
> From: "April" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-95.5 required=10.0
>
tests=MAY_BE_FORGED,GREAT_OFFER,CLICK_BELOW,OPT_IN,EMAIL_MARKETING,A_FROM_IN
_AUTO_WLIST
> version=2.01
>
> So the address was in the auto whitelist, which gave -100 points.
> I don't use the auto whitelist feature myself, so I can't tell you why
> the address is in there unless you received mail from them before that
> wasn't spammy in nature.
>
>
> You also seem to be using 2.01 which is fairly out-of-date now.  Can you
> upgrade to 2.20?
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> I'm reminded of the day my daughter came in, looked over my shoulder at
>  some Perl 4 code, and said, "What is that, swearing?"
>               -- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to