On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:45:11AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> For me:
> SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.6 hits, 5 required)
Oops. That was on your actual message. The real results against the
attached message was:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (7 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: Hit! (1.3 points) 'Received:' has 'may be forged' warning
SPAM: Hit! (1.4 points) BODY: Trying to offer you something
SPAM: Hit! (1.5 points) BODY: Asks you to click below
SPAM: Hit! (2.1 points) BODY: Talks about opting in
SPAM: Hit! (0.7 points) BODY: Talks about email marketing
SPAM: Hit! (0.0 points) Reply-To: massively different from From: or To:
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
