Theo -- ...and then Theo Van Dinter said... % % On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:15:28AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > % -body ONE_TIME_MAILING /this\b.{0,20}\b(?:one|1).time\b.{0,20}\b(?:mail|offer)/i % > % +body ONE_TIME_MAILING /this\b.{0,20}\b(?:one|1).time\b.{0,20}\b(?:(?:e-?)?mail|offer)/i % > % > 1) I'm no regexp guru, so I'm sure that the former is necessary for some % > reason even in light of the latter, but why not one that covers both with % > something like % > % > instead of two rules? % % It's one rule. The text is the output of diff, so "-body" is the current % one, and "+body" is the new one.
Oh! I get it. There was no other context, so I didn't make the connection. I guess that explains it :-) [Hey, I'm just glad my "why not use one rule?" idea was the same as, apparently, yours.] % % > 3) Genie, not Aladdin (unless you're specifically referring to Aladdin % > quoting him) % % More of stating the movie, not the character. :) Fair enough :-) % % -- % Randomly Generated Tagline: % Work off excess energy. Steal something heavy. Thanks & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg04961/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature