Theo --

...and then Theo Van Dinter said...
% 
% On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:15:28AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > % -body ONE_TIME_MAILING            
/this\b.{0,20}\b(?:one|1).time\b.{0,20}\b(?:mail|offer)/i
% > % +body ONE_TIME_MAILING            
/this\b.{0,20}\b(?:one|1).time\b.{0,20}\b(?:(?:e-?)?mail|offer)/i
% > 
% > 1) I'm no regexp guru, so I'm sure that the former is necessary for some
% > reason even in light of the latter, but why not one that covers both with
% > something like
% > 
% > instead of two rules?
% 
% It's one rule.  The text is the output of diff, so "-body" is the current
% one, and "+body" is the new one.

Oh!  I get it.  There was no other context, so I didn't make the
connection.  I guess that explains it :-)  [Hey, I'm just glad my "why
not use one rule?" idea was the same as, apparently, yours.]


% 
% > 3) Genie, not Aladdin (unless you're specifically referring to Aladdin
% > quoting him)
% 
% More of stating the movie, not the character. :)

Fair enough :-)


% 
% -- 
% Randomly Generated Tagline:
% Work off excess energy.  Steal something heavy.


Thanks & HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!

Attachment: msg04961/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to