On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:21:05PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> > Yep. Running spamproxyd is really not an option for most of us.
> > You lose (if I'm not mistaken)
> > - SMTP AUTH
>
> Nope, at least not with my model. Admittedly this /is/ vaporware
> because I don't need it, but it would work just fine with this.
>
> > - The option to have your real MTA refuse the message at SMTP time.
>
> Nope. The pass-through aspect works here as well, though it does mean
> that SA runs before any MTA tests.
Sorry, I misunderstood what spamproxyd does.
I still can't use it, but it's more flexible than I thought, thanks for
correcting me.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
