Charlie Watts wrote: CW> And, hey, if you've got ESP math working even to the point of a test CW> release, you can quit your day job. CW> CW> I haven't actually noticed it to be a useful blacklisting tool, anyway. CW> I've had it in my head that it could be useful as both, but haven't seen CW> it dragging otherwise-uncaught spam across the threshold.
I think the probably most effective blacklist-type use of the AWL would be in calculating zero-frequency a-priori probabilities for new recipients who were not previously in the AWL. As I mentioned before, if after say 1 month of populating the AWL through normal correspondence, a new never-before-seen recipient is encountered, I think that's probably a sign of spamminess. C _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
