I think my opinion is that it's not critical at this juncture, I just wanted to get a sense of what the options and complexities would be down the road when (if?) we do eventually need to deal with the issue. I wouldn't prioritize it particularly high at the moment. We'll see where things go after 2.30 is out and a lot more people start using SA/DCC together.
C Matt Sergeant wrote: MS> Craig R Hughes wrote: MS> > You are correct that MS> > there is no current Perl DCC client implementation; I've been discussing it MS> > today on the DCC mailing list, and it sounds like it would non-trivial to MS> > implement. MS> MS> If it's just a bit of XS code to write, it's actually trivial. Let me MS> know if you want me to look at it. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk