I think my opinion is that it's not critical at this juncture, I just wanted to
get a sense of what the options and complexities would be down the road when
(if?) we do eventually need to deal with the issue.  I wouldn't prioritize it
particularly high at the moment.  We'll see where things go after 2.30 is out
and a lot more people start using SA/DCC together.

C

Matt Sergeant wrote:

MS> Craig R Hughes wrote:
MS> >  You are correct that
MS> > there is no current Perl DCC client implementation; I've been discussing it
MS> > today on the DCC mailing list, and it sounds like it would non-trivial to
MS> > implement.
MS>
MS> If it's just a bit of XS code to write, it's actually trivial. Let me
MS> know if you want me to look at it.


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to