I think the section for dcc in Conf.pm is wrong. Shouldn't it be $1 instead of $1+0 for the dcc_body_max,etc?
-----Original Message----- From: Craig R Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:04 AM To: Rose, Bobby Cc: Richie Laager; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [PATCH] DCC Reporting Ok, fixed the concat problem -- line 181 should have read self->{main}->{conf} not self->{conf} Comitting now. C Rose, Bobby wrote: RB> Thanks. RB> RB> Richie, I downloaded the CVS and it doesn't appear that the report RB> function worked. If -D is used then I see RB> RB> debug: DCC is available RB> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at RB> /opt/ActivePerl-5.6/lib/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.p RB> m RB> line 181. RB> debug: SpamAssassin: spam reported to DCC. RB> RB> RB> RB> -----Original Message----- RB> From: Craig R Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] RB> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:20 AM RB> To: Rose, Bobby RB> Cc: Richie Laager; [EMAIL PROTECTED] RB> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [PATCH] DCC Reporting RB> RB> RB> No, what I'm suggesting is make wrappers Mail::SpamAssassin::DCC.pm RB> which just implements the functions that are now in Reporter.pm and RB> Dns.pm, but just consolidate them to one location. And do the same RB> for the similar razor-wrapper functions that are currently in RB> Reporter and Dns too. You are correct that there is no current Perl RB> DCC client implementation; I've been discussing it today on the DCC RB> mailing list, and it sounds like it would non-trivial to implement. RB> Might be worth looking at if there turn out to be performance issues RB> with larger sites interested in having their own spam signature RB> database but don't want to pay Cloudmark for the priviledge, but we RB> can broach those when we come to them. RB> RB> As for the debug info, just pass debug=>1 in the Mail::SpamAssassin RB> constructor RB> -- see spamassassin or spamd for an example RB> RB> C RB> RB> Rose, Bobby wrote: RB> RB> RB> Is there a DCC.pm? It appearred to me that dcc is a exec RB> RB> process and not a perl module. I've come across something odd RB> RB> when using Mailscanner and SA with DCC. If I pass a DCC RB> RB> reported message thru dccproc or spamassassin then the report RB> RB> reflects the listing. But when Mailscanner sends it to SA, RB> RB> there isn't a DCC test. Every other test is reported back thru RB> RB> the object, just not DCC. RB> RB> RB> RB> Any ideas on how I can get some SA debug info when using RB> RB> Mail::SpamAssassin calls? RB> RB> RB> RB> RB> _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
