Craig R Hughes wrote: CRH> Ok, I'll go look at what was in CVS and build the word list from there. I agree CRH> on the number of words thing. We can probably get around that by calculating CRH> the %age of words which are on the list, instead of having a hard threshold. ie CRH> more like the spam phrases stuff where it comes up with a "porn phrase" score...
Ok, I just checked in a "fixed" version of Daniel's suggested change. It's not doing the adjustment-to-threshold-based-on-message length SO BE WARY IF YOU'RE IN THE HABIT OF USING CVS -- THIS CURRENT CODE MIGHT YIELD A BUNCH OF FALSE POSITIVES. It's somewhat unlikely, I think it's still a pretty tight rule, but be careful for a day or two. C _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
