On Wednesday 01 May 2002 09:31 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Probably right. All the same logic applies to PORN_3 too, and I want to > break that one up, but of course PORN_3 is trickier because of the > triple-repeat part. PORN_3 is far and away the worst performing rule in the > book. Fully 10% of the execution time per message is being consumed by > testing PORN_3.
Maybe PORN_3 should be eliminated and replaced with a spam phrases type thing? We could take the current spam phrases algorithms, tweak them some, then have a porn phrases file in addition to a spam phrases file (though the porn phrases file would probably have to be created manually). -- Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm largest human edited web directory. | for a minute, but set him on fire, and | he'll be warm for the rest of his life. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 132152059 | _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
