On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:56:02PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote: > With the new version 2.20 I got a false positive with a newsletter > I receive. > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.8 required=5.0 tests=EXCUSE_3, > HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL version=2.20 > X-Spam-Report: 6.8 hits, 5 required; > * 2.7 -- BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list > * 4.1 -- URI: 'remove' URL contains an email address > > The point is not, how to avoid SA marking this specific newsletter > as spam, I can do that, but the score of 4.1 for HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL > seems a bit high. > SA 2.11 scored this mail with 1.0 and 1.8 (and also matched PENIS_ENLARGE2 :-).
You should make a rule for this newsletter. > > Or is a threshold of 5 too low ? What do other people use ? I use 4.0, and I'm very happy. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk