On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:56:02PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> With the new version 2.20 I got a false positive with a newsletter
> I receive.
> 
>   X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.8 required=5.0 tests=EXCUSE_3,
>       HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL version=2.20
>   X-Spam-Report:   6.8 hits, 5 required;
>     *  2.7 -- BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
>     *  4.1 -- URI: 'remove' URL contains an email address
> 
> The point is not, how to avoid SA marking this specific newsletter
> as spam, I can do that, but the score of 4.1 for HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL
> seems a bit high.
> SA 2.11 scored this mail with 1.0 and 1.8 (and also matched PENIS_ENLARGE2 :-).

You should make a rule for this newsletter.

> 
> Or is a threshold of 5 too low ? What do other people use ?

I use 4.0, and I'm very happy.

-- 
Duncan Findlay

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to