Not to mention that the minute a spammer has the cojones to appear in
court to sue anyone for blocking their spam, you can just slap them with
a counter-suit for illegally using your computing resources.  IF you
read through the DMCA I bet you can even find ways of getting them sent
to jail for 20-life too.  Be creative!

C

On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 16:45, Michael Geier wrote:
> I believe that many people are looking at this in the wrong way...perhaps an 
> analogy would help:
>            We all sue Microsoft because of the Melissa virus, because 
>            the virus was propagated through holes in their software.
> 
> Anyone want to guess whether or not this would fly?
> ISP's, or server administrators, choose to use a software package.  The intent 
> of the software is not the issue.  Ted Kazinsky could have written his letter 
> bombs in Word, does that make the software liable?
> 
> SpamAssassin, and its creator(s), in and of themselves do not create intent.  
> And, as at least one person has stated somewhere in this discussion, it is the 
> administrators (mail server or ISP) that CHOOSE to use the software.  As a 
> user, I can choose to include the MONSTERHUT rule or not.  Therefore, if I do 
> include it, it is my choice and not the software's responsibility.
> 
> Any lawsuits arising from the use of SpamAssassin would have to attack the 
> responsibile parties (ie. admins).  Care to guess whether or not spammers will 
> have enough money to go after us all?  Should they win and I can no longer use 
> SpamAssaassin, there are a number of other products that can be implemented, or 
> I could just roll my own (heavily influenced by SA rules and procedures).
> -- 
> Michael Geier
> CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator
>     email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505
>     pager: 314.318.9414 || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Quoting Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > Hey, if anyone sues, I'll just say it's Justin's fault, and they can try
> > and track him down wherever he is in Asia...
> > 
> > C
> > 
> > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 13:31, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 March 2002 08:55 am, Jason Kohles wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 10:18, Smith, Rick wrote:
> > > > > How long do you think it will be until users of SA face the same
> > > > > consequences as the now infamous ORBZ case ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sure that some lawyer out there could find a way to sue someone
> > for
> > > > > running this package.
> > > >
> > > > The problem with ORBZ didn't have anything to do with anti-spam in
> > > > general, the problem was that the specific actions it used to determine
> > > > if a mail server was an open relay would crash lotus notes mail
> > > > servers.
> > > 
> > > MAPS (Mail Abuse Prevention System) has been sued by several spammers, for
> > 
> > > defemation/libel and restraint of trade (or something like that); see 
> > > http://mail-abuse.org/in-the-news.html
> > > 
> > > Also, I believe that AOL was once sued by a spammer, and was forced to stop
> > 
> > > filtering that spammers emails to AOL users.
> > > 
> > > So theroetically spammers *could* sue SA if they are specifically listed in
> > 
> > > SA rules.  For instance, MonsterHut.com could sue us for defemation and/or
> > 
> > > restraint of trade, and since, ulike MAPS, we have no legal defence fund,
> > 
> > > we'd have to take them out.  However, spam which matches our general 
> > > heuristics wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on, since in that case SA is
> > 
> > > only saying that it *looks* like spam, and we acknowledge that it can lead
> > to 
> > > false positives.  A spammer might still be able to sue an individual ISP to
> > 
> > > stop them from filtering spam, like happened with AOL.
> > > 
> > > However, if a bunch of spammers co-operated, each of them could file a 
> > > seperate suit against SA in different jurisdictions, and more spammers
> > could 
> > > bring up suits when the old ones were thrown out; you can use anyone for 
> > > anything, even if it ends up getting thrown out of court.  If this happened
> > 
> > > enough, we'd get sued out of existence.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's   | Give a man a match, and he'll be
> > warm
> > > largest human edited web directory.  | for a minute, but set him on fire,
> > and
> > >                                      | he'll be warm for the rest of his
> > life.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ICQ: 132152059 |
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through CDM Sports Webmail.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to