Moving this to spamassassin-devel, please take spamassassin-talk out of the To/Cc if you followup...
I agree on not closing bugs -- looks like maybe Charlie did that one by accident? As far as verified, sure go ahead and use it -- but normally if I'm going to all the trouble of verifying something, I might as well fix it at the same time ;) C On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 14:51, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:19:22AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED > > > > > > > > I really thing no bug should be set to CLOSED. CLOSED bugs should really > only be bugs that are entirely irrelevant, i.e. the program it's discussing > no longer exists, or it's a bug from 4 or 5 releases ago. > > But perhaps, that's just because I used to do a bit of work in the Mozilla > Bugzilla, where nothing is (ever?) closed. > > Right now we aren't using VERIFIED, and we probably should. > > -- > Duncan Findlay > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
