On Thursday 07 March 2002 11:27, you wrote:
> People were asking for ti to be tested so I did. I don't have vipuls razor
> installed so the changes for that will not matter for me. In use it seems
> about the same speed when used:
> spamassassin -P
> however when used as:
> spamc
> it is much slower. It is about twice as slow as using spamassassin -P.
I can confirm that spamd appears to be not working. I also instaled razor and
by installing it spamassassin seems to be running much faster.
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Brook Humphrey
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holiness unto the Lord
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
