David G. Andersen wrote: > > > anyone else seeing false-positives more often with 2.11? > > > > Yes, I have had to roll back to 2.01. > > A bit of a suggestion, since you're seeing false positives in a highly > specific domain. I've been creating word-frequency-based whitelists > from various mailing lists I'm on (alas, little genetics talk). > But I've found great success on matching networking-geek specific > terms, and would think the same approach would prove quite fruitful > for genetics specific terms. Spammers, happily, don't often say > adenosine. :-)
That is an interesting suggestion, although most of the false positives were not related to genetic specific terms. Solid blocks of ACGT do trigger the whole line of shouting, but an empty Subject should not trigger Subject is all in capitals. An e-mail with a base-64 attachment should not count as spam with no other trigger. I also had one e-mail that triggered the ascii form and whole line of shouting, where I cannot see a whole line of shouting and I have not yet had time to work out what triggered the form, but it is not obvious to the beginner (me). All the best Geoff Gibbs UK-Human Genome Mapping Project-Resource Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SB, UK Tel: +44 1223 494530 Fax: +44 1223 494512 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
