I had the perlipc manpage signal handler in there in the first place, and it had to be replaced with the one you just re-replaced. Definitely would be good to have a number of BSDers hammer on this patch before I roll it in. Otherwise, I could roll it in with a giant "Don't use -m on BSD" warning.
C On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 16:22, Duncan Findlay wrote: > I have proposed a patch to limit the number of children spawned by spamd. It > can be reached at http://bugzilla.debian.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=3 > > In order to make the patch, I had to remove a line saying 'important: avoids > perl sighandling bug on BSD' > > I imagine that the new sighandler is better than the one that prompted the > warning, since it is essentially copied from the perlipc manpage, but I > would like to be sure. Could someone running BSD please try this patch, and > try the -m option to limit children? I'd appreciate it. > > Any comments should probably go to > http://bugzilla.debian.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78 > > The patch works great on linux. Anyone running spamd on a slow computer > should consider it. > > -- > Duncan Findlay > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
