On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 17:52, William R Ward wrote:
> Hmm, looks like I was wrong.  It does apparently have spammish
> headers.  I don't know anything about osirusoft.com, but spamassassin
> says it's a spammer

Actually I would say that I was wrong. Spamassassin did not think that
the body was spam. I guess I would be annoyed if someone sent me an
unsolicited solicitation for a donation, but spamassassin is smart
enough to separate that from the various scams and ads that spammers
actually do send out.

osirusoft.com is not a spammer. They run a DNS server that programs like
spamassassin can use to look up an ip address that is in a mail header
to see if it belongs to a spammer or an open relay that is used by
spammers. You have to take some of databases there with a grain of salt,
as some are a bit overzealous in adding ip addresses to their list.

I run using the -L option to disable all network based checks since I
found that it took seconds to check one email with them and a small
fraction of a second without them, and they had too many false positives
compared to the little bit of extra spam they caught.

If you disable the network checks your email would have passed with a
score of just 2.4.

I believe that Craig runs the rule scoring without any of the network
checks, which would make it too slow, so the scores are optimized
without them.

 -- sidney




_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to