on 2/18/02 11:23 AM, Daniel Rogers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:29:53AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: >> I'll happily accept patches. In the meantime, killing spamd won't cause >> any loss of mail, only loss of identification of spam messages for that >> fraction of a second when it's not listening, or for those messages >> already in process. spamc will just dump the unprocessed message back >> out if processing fails for whatever reason. > > Actually, unless this has changed in 2.0, killing 1.5 would result in small > amounts of whitespace being returned and written to the mailbox, thereby > corrupting it (mailbox wouldn't start with 'From '). > > Has anyone ever looked at adding size checking to the part of spamc where it > gets the filtered message back from spamd? > > Dan.
Spamc does size checking, for a while now. I think at least since 2.0, certainly 2.01 C _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
