On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:29:53AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > I'll happily accept patches. In the meantime, killing spamd won't cause > any loss of mail, only loss of identification of spam messages for that > fraction of a second when it's not listening, or for those messages > already in process. spamc will just dump the unprocessed message back > out if processing fails for whatever reason.
Actually, unless this has changed in 2.0, killing 1.5 would result in small amounts of whitespace being returned and written to the mailbox, thereby corrupting it (mailbox wouldn't start with 'From '). Has anyone ever looked at adding size checking to the part of spamc where it gets the filtered message back from spamd? Dan. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
