On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mark wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:35 PM
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code
> 
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mark wrote:
>>
>> > Dear people,
>> >
>> > Being rather interested in running the spamd daemon, I tried to run a
>> > test message in a small test Perl script, having the daemon running, of
>> > course, on my FreeBSD 4.1 server; it looks as follows:

[...]

>> > Funny thing is, I keep getting error code 74. I thought it would only
>> > exit with either 1 or 0? Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Most MTAs will use the return codes from /usr/include/sysexit.h to
>> determine what went wrong when they talk to a child process of some sort.
>> spamc seems to use this convention to, with:
>>
>> #define EX_IOERR 74 /* input/output error */
>>
>> So, I guess that spamc can't get at either an input or output channel of
>> some sort...
>>
>> Daniel
> 
> Ok, I did a debug on it. Here is what is says; what is that Razor thing it
> says is missing?

Vipul's Razor, "a collaborative spam filtering system."

It stores the checksum of verified SPAM on the network and allows
clients to check incoming mail against those values. That way you can,
in theory, catch SPAM on the network.

        Daniel

-- 
When there is a gap betweem one's real and one's declared aims, one turns, as
it were, instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish
squirting out ink.
        -- George Orwell

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to