On 6 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: > > b) (preferred) get the "To" address logged > > To get that logged, you'll need to have spamd process the message as > that user I think, which means removing the '-u' flags from both command > lines. What it's logging is really not who the To: is to, but rather > who the user is for which the config files are being read. I suppose it > would be smart to log the To: line, if one exists, in situations where > currently it just dumps "(unknown)". I'll take a look at the code and > add that if it's easy.
Eh, don't do that. Including the To: address is useless. Which To: address do you include? What about To:-less messages? Envelope recipients are nice ... a portable way to get the envelope recipient into spamd would be -great-, because we could include a "recipient not listed in To/Cc" rule. (Though that poses scoring issues...) -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
