On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>> I would be extremely happy to see SpamAssassin extended to recognize
>> the routine, vaguely irritating spam that is attached to "free" email
>> messages and the like.
>
> I think I will give my regexp skills a shot at this, as it is probably
> the biggest single factor which causes hotmail/msn email to be hit as
> spam. (that and the forged headers but I scored that a 0.0 right now)
Cool. If you were to post the results to the list, that would be nifty.
That way I can steal your hard work. ;)
>> Of course, I plan on building my own GA evolved scores from my 1.5GB
>> body of mail, so it's not /such/ an issue for me. :)
>
> That's quite the corpus. I personally don't think I have a "pure"
> enough base to do so, and especially nothing that huge. :-)
*grin* I worked out, a few years ago, that it cost me less to keep all
my mail around on disk, given the (then higher than today) price of
storage, even for a laptop, than the irritation of needing to go hunting
for some stupid, unusable HTML archive that wasn't worth the bother
anyway.
Of course, this is the first time I have ever thought "if only I kept
more SPAM in it" about the content. ;)
Daniel
--
We used to hate people.
Now we just make fun of them.
It's more effective that way.
-- KMFDF, _Dogma_
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
