----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Daniel Rogers wrote: > > > I think that 4.33 might be a little aggressive for HTML-only mail. > > Especially with a default threshhold of 5. > <snip> > > Finally, I see why this matches the 'Forged eudoramail.com' test, but > > should it? It seems like a perfectly valid set of excite.com headers > > to me. > > I agree on both counts. > > Is the false eudoramail.com hit because of an editing mistake? It looks > like the forged eudoramail and forged excite checks are almost identical. > I wonder if there was a copy/paste that didn't get edited ... > Justin/Craig? > > Is the really high HTML-only score a GA-created one? WOW, is that high.
I think it's another case of geek generated GA's. I've got a lot of subscription stuff in my false positive folder with HTML only emails. Once I get my toolset for processing this stuff sorted, I'll see if I can't find a way to run the GA on this highly diverse mailbox. The only trouble is trying to sort 10,000 emails a day into the right folders is causing a massive drain on my energy and will to live ;-) Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
