The score for HTML only is GA-evolved. My GA actually scores it even higher than justin's against the spam corpus.
C
On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 16:07, Charlie Watts wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Daniel Rogers wrote: > I think that 4.33 might be a little aggressive for HTML-only mail. > Especially with a default threshhold of 5. <snip> > Finally, I see why this matches the 'Forged eudoramail.com' test, but > should it? It seems like a perfectly valid set of excite.com headers > to me. I agree on both counts. Is the false eudoramail.com hit because of an editing mistake? It looks like the forged eudoramail and forged excite checks are almost identical. I wonder if there was a copy/paste that didn't get edited ... Justin/Craig? Is the really high HTML-only score a GA-created one? WOW, is that high. -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
