> The thing is, if a spammer is claiming to be an actual person, but > isn't, then that person who's being impersonated almost certainly has > legal recourse for damages from the spammer. If I were a spammer, I'd > avoid doing this, just in case I used someone's address who cared enough > to come after me.
If this sort of thing is a trend (and I haven't seen one yet, but who knows) it's also an argument in favor of PGP signatures for those who are well-known enough to be targets of spammers. Doesn't SA already have a negative score for valid PGP signatures? Or is it just a simple regexp check for something resembling one? -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "An ignorant person is one who doesn't know what you have just found out." -- Will Rogers _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
