Matt Sergeant said:
> > Basically a spam-check may take up to 10 seconds per mail, so > > sendmail should run only a certain number of concurrent deliveries > > (20 or so?) and wait for them to complete before spawning more. > > 10 seconds is way too long for us. We aim to get that down to about 0.5 > seconds or less in the next few days. BTW I'm assuming the various network accesses (to Razor, DNSbls, and MX lookups) are taking 90% of that time. With lots of DNS caching, local DNSbl secondarying, and fat pipes, that should come down nicely. --j. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk