On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:47:39PM +1100, Nat Sloss wrote: > nop > fnop > > could be executed as > > nop > (context swtich) > (return from context swtich) > fnop > > So without these the fnop would not be coverted.
Not sure what you mean here. Why would the nop before the rte make any difference in this flow of instructions? Martin
