> On Jan 1, 2019, at 9:23 PM, m...@netbsd.org wrote: > > I'll note I don't know of a single package using LLVM and a library as > well as libGL, even though it looks like it should be a likely scenario. > > The closest example was Octave that uses 3D graphs (with acceleration) > and at some opint had a LLVM-based JIT, but had given up on it because > it was an unexpected amount of work to keep up with LLVM.
If this is something we're concerned about, then the right thing to would be to make a private version of the LLVM libraries with symbols renamed into a private namespace for Mesa to use, so that an application linking against Mesa *and* some other version of LLVM's internals would work. -- thorpej
