> On Jan 1, 2019, at 8:26 PM, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> 
> Having two versions of LLVM in use by a binary is going to fail in
> surprising ways.
> 
> Base can be several years old at some point, increasing the odds of the
> LLVM non-compatibility biting us.
> And libGL is very widely used.

You're conflating two things that aren't related.  Mesa's use of LLVM is 
conceptually similar to the "Canadian cross", and at no point should the 
compiler run-times of the "build", "host", or "target" systems ever intermingle.

-- thorpej

Reply via email to