Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:59:40 +1000 from: matthew green <m...@eterna.com.au>
Martin Husemann writes: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +0000, Maxime Villard wrote: > > stupid comment, and make sure we are not executing a lib > > When I first ran into the "exec a .so" path I've been told it is a feature > and exists on purpose (though our native in-tree libs do not make use of it). ya - this might actually break some linux binary packages, where there is a well-defined interface to executing a library. i think this part should be reverted. In that case, there should be automatic tests for it.
