On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:08:18PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20130322030831.ga10...@britannica.bec.de>, > Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: > > > >This is wrong and unnecessary as pointed out on the mailing lists. Why > >are technical objections silently ignored now? Especially if they add > >overhead without any gain and make the error case more mysterious. > > Technical discussions are not being ignored. This is considered > the best compromise at this time to fix the regression for NetBSD-6. > We cannot wait forever to fix problems. You are welcome to do > better. No-one is right all the time. As mentioned in the commit > message, this is not the final solution.
I did already post a patch that fixes the problem for devel/glib. So yes, I provided a better fix and it was ignored. Joerg
