In article <20130322030831.ga10...@britannica.bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: > >This is wrong and unnecessary as pointed out on the mailing lists. Why >are technical objections silently ignored now? Especially if they add >overhead without any gain and make the error case more mysterious.
Technical discussions are not being ignored. This is considered the best compromise at this time to fix the regression for NetBSD-6. We cannot wait forever to fix problems. You are welcome to do better. No-one is right all the time. As mentioned in the commit message, this is not the final solution. christos